Will it be a Slam Dunk for the United States Sports Betting Ban?

Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting ban?

By Natalie Sherman

Business press reporter, New york city

A restriction on sports betting in most US states might be reversed by a case being considered by the Supreme Court.

The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that mainly outlawed sports betting, explaining the matter as a “states’ rights” concern.

The case, which began on Monday, comes after New Jersey citizens voted in 2011 to legalise sports betting.

A group of sports betting leagues opposes banking on video games, which they fear will motivate match-fixing.

Lower courts have actually consistently ruled against New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government’s power to limit a state’s policy options.

The Supreme Court chose to hear the case however amid a wider shift in American attitudes toward gambling.

Before 1976, Nevada – home of the Las Vegas strip – was the only state with legal casinos outside Native American lands.

But in the last few years, states hungry for tax profits in the wake of the monetary crash have actually enacted a rash of looser gambling laws, collecting significant levies on gambling profits.

There are now 24 states with industrial gambling establishments – roughly double the number a years ago.

Despite the official ban, which already excuses Nevada and 3 other states, illegal sports betting is swarming in the US.

Americans put about $154bn in prohibited sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.

The association’s president, Geoff Freeman, described the federal ban, external as an “utter failure” previously this year.

It says the UK is an example of a where sports betting is commonplace.

“It’s time for Washington to stop denying states of important tax revenue and permit them to reap the benefits of a regulated market,” Mr Freeman said.

More than 15 states submitted documents in support of New Jersey in the case. A handful have actually already passed laws to authorise sports betting in the occasion of a change.

‘Times have changed’

On Monday, as lawyers began arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.

The court is anticipated to decide in June 2018.

“If we succeed here we could have bets being taken in New Jersey within 2 weeks of a choice by the court,” said outbound New Jersey guv Chris Christie after participating in the court hearing. “We’re prepared in New Jersey – we’re prepared to go.”

Despite the court’s last ruling, Congress may also take up the debate amid more comprehensive conversation about online gaming and e-sports betting.

Even some of the professional sports betting leagues have actually begun to change their positions on the question of gaming.

Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would create an uniform set of guidelines throughout the US. “Times have actually changed,” he composed in a 2014 viewpoint piece, external.

Addicts having problem with mobile wagering

3 October 2017

The difficult issue of problem gambling

31 August 2017